AI CompendiumA public chart of the language
Home / Training & Inference / Reasoning Model
Training & Inference

Reasoning Model

also called Thinking model, Hybrid reasoning

A model trained to spend tokens thinking before it answers.

Definition

A model trained — usually with reinforcement learning on problems that can be checked — to produce a long internal reasoning process before its final answer. You pay for the thinking in tokens and latency and get better performance on multi-step problems.

The practical difference from a standard model is that reasoning is a resource you buy rather than a prompting technique you apply. Where the API exposes a thinking budget, that budget is the main new dial: more thinking for hard problems, less for simple ones.

The token accounting is the practical change: thinking tokens are billed and they count toward the context window, so a reasoning model that "thinks" for two thousand tokens has spent real money and real budget before producing a visible word. Budgets and prompt design have to account for that.

How people use it
Choosing a model per workload.
"Extraction does not need a reasoning model. Route the twenty percent of requests that involve real analysis to one and keep the rest cheap."
Worked example

The premium that bought nothing

A routing rule sends every request to a reasoning model after it wins a benchmark comparison.

On the extraction workload — which is most of the volume — latency triples and cost rises sharply with no accuracy change, because the task was never reasoning-bound. Restrict the reasoning model to the request class where it demonstrably wins on your eval set.

Avoid

Using one for everything. On simple extraction and classification you pay a large latency and token premium for thinking that improves nothing.

Sources
Related terms